Pages
Categories
Archives
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
Meta
Is it worth it to spend 25,000 dollars to restore a car every 15 years?
25th November 2008
dee9051 asked:
Or is it better to just buy a new car. I’m looking to do a restoration on a cadillac allante or mercedes 500sl. Parts Labor will run me 25k. But I like the old styling. Is it worth it to do it?
Oswaldo
Or is it better to just buy a new car. I’m looking to do a restoration on a cadillac allante or mercedes 500sl. Parts Labor will run me 25k. But I like the old styling. Is it worth it to do it?
Oswaldo
Posted in: Cars | | Comments (11)
11 Comments
RSS feed for comments on this post.
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.













Depends on how much you like your car…otherwise I’d say just get a new one.
Comment by Alexandra — November 27, 2008 @ 1:50 pm
Absolutely not. It’s a waste of money. Both of those cars, while they may be interesting classics, are far from a modern car in terms of safety performance, and reliability. IN fact the Cadillac was a lousy car to begin with, so it’s not worth much even in perfect condition. Old styling is nice. Old engineering *****.
Comment by JeffyB — November 30, 2008 @ 10:41 pm
25000 you droppin 800 horses in there or do you like getting screwd
Comment by johnny big block — December 1, 2008 @ 12:24 am
New one. Un less it is an antique, GET A NEW CAR!
Comment by irreplaceably_rare — December 4, 2008 @ 10:58 am
NO not at all
Comment by mix man — December 6, 2008 @ 10:34 pm
Of those two cars, I’d bet the Benz will make it to Barrett Jackson first, even though the Allante had a Pinninfarina design, and was reasonably rare. Restrorations are never cost efficient, they are a labor of love or protecting an investment that will later be sold for a profit.
Comment by Carl K — December 10, 2008 @ 7:51 am
Call the insurance company find out what the payoff is if you total it out. If you put 25k in a car that will be worth 10k 2 years from now and you totalled it out you’ll be losing big bucks
Comment by gejandsons — December 12, 2008 @ 9:12 am
If those cars are worth it to you then go for it. I personally would not put that kind of money into one of the cars you mentioned above, you would never be able to get it back. But it’s somewhat like collecting things. You buy what like, what appeals to you regardless of cost. One day that item might be worth more might be worth less? Ya just never know? Remember that something is only worth as much as one is willing to pay for it.
Have fun!
Comment by deanspurrier — December 12, 2008 @ 8:09 pm
I read an article once on this very question.
Buying the shell you want and fitting it out with mod cons and mechanicals may cost you $25000, (that’s a Conservative guess, add 1/3rd.) but won’t de-value once you hit the road.
You will drive something unique and of your making, and when your bored with it, will re coupe a large chunk of your money.
As for 15 years? it’s rare to hold a car this long, plan on 5years
Comment by dinkydionline — December 16, 2008 @ 7:05 am
The problem with restoring relatively recent cars is that the cars tend to have expensive components that will become harder and harder to replace. Whereas any fabrication company can make any part on a 1967 Camaro, the 500SL has many modern features that may go expensively awry. A few examples, the fully automatic roof is completely computerized and has lots of hydraulics to keep functional. A roof replacement could cost thousands.
A 500SL also has lots of expensive components like ABS, ASR, auto leveling suspension, and a 4 cam, 32V engine that is a long way from a chevy small block. It’s essentially a modern car with 15 years of wear on it, which means that a $15K used 500SL will have parts that are comparable in cost to an $80K new SL 500.
On the other hand, if you really think you can keep the car pristine for $25K every 15 years then it’s a fair deal. $1800 in maintenance a year is cheaper than any car payment, because even new cars cost money to maintain. Up to you, though I’m in agreement with you that Bruno Sacco’s design for the 1990-2001 Mercedes SL is a wonderful car. If I were you I might sell my early SL to get a later example… they’ve depreciated quite a bit compared to the new model.
I would not have any qualms with driving a 500SL today, it was ahead of its time in many ways and has many modern safety systems. The Allante would give me pause mainly because I **** front wheel drive and the questionable GM heritage.
Comment by Nick N — December 19, 2008 @ 2:56 pm
on an old muscle car it is but not on an allante as they are not in demand right now and don’t hold their value.
Comment by mister ss — December 20, 2008 @ 3:49 am