Pages
Categories
Archives
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
Meta
I want to restore a older car is a 65-66 mustang a good choice?
30th April 2007
jason f asked:
I have a 289 completely rebuilt with zero miles on it. Its a dandy. Should I put it in a mustang. How much does a 65-66 cost with a bad motor?
Luigi
I have a 289 completely rebuilt with zero miles on it. Its a dandy. Should I put it in a mustang. How much does a 65-66 cost with a bad motor?
Luigi
Posted in: Cars | | Comments (6)
6 Comments
RSS feed for comments on this post.
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.













I am not a fan of mustangs but they are always a good place to start with when restoring cars. The bodies range anywhere from 200 – 20000. You just have to shop around. They are a great first project because the parts are relatively plentiful & easy to come by and ford used a lot of the same parts from year to year & in other cars.
Comment by lovesnowy — May 1, 2007 @ 2:11 pm
this is a good choice for a restoration. However as popular as these cars are be expected to spend $2500-5000 for a restorable car. The variation depends on overall condition and location.
Comment by yes_its_me — May 1, 2007 @ 8:13 pm
From a frame and suspension perspective I think the car is total crap. The front ends sag, the towers collapse and they rust badly. For restoration I recommend a car with a full frame that was built to last. That mustang was not designed to go very many miles. Trade the 289 for a fairlane or a galaxy.
Comment by chequemonque — May 2, 2007 @ 5:44 am
Around $3000-5000, the 1965-66 Mustang’s are highly collectible cars, another alternative at a lower price would be a Ford Falcon or a Mercury Comet.
Comment by rockintrain397 — May 4, 2007 @ 8:15 am
they can be fun and easy to work on, plus parts are easy to get.
Some thoughts, If you get a coupe, it’s easy to get more money wraped in it than it’s worth.
Also, the 2+2 and converts are very expensive in any condition
Here is a good group to join
Comment by SVOMAN — May 7, 2007 @ 5:29 pm
do the 66 stang its a great choice
Comment by John W — May 11, 2007 @ 2:20 am